Influencer-Ad Law: What Creators Must Know from This Week’s Standout Campaigns (Lego, e.l.f., Skittles)

Hook: Why this week’s big-brand ads matter to every creator

If you’re an influencer or creator, one viral brand campaign can feel like a masterclass — and a minefield. When Lego, e.l.f. and Skittles rolled out standout activations this week, the creative wins were obvious. What’s less obvious (and far more costly) are the contract and disclosure traps behind the cameras: unclear usage rights, one-sided indemnities, and disclosures that won’t hold up under 2026 enforcement scrutiny.

Read on for practical, contract-level takeaways you can use in negotiations today — plus ready-to-copy clauses, platform-specific disclosure language, and a sign-before-you-sign checklist to prevent monetization loss, takedowns, and surprise liability.

Top-line takeaways (most important things first)

1. Never transfer all rights for a flat fee. Ask for limited licenses or an explicit buyout fee when brands want perpetual, worldwide rights.
2. Insist on clear AI-training and reuse language. As Lego’s AI-themed work shows, brands increasingly want AI use rights — negotiate carveouts.
3. Get indemnities written for real-world risk allocation. Brands should indemnify creators for third-party claims arising from brand-provided assets; creators should cap their liability.
4. Make disclosures both verbal and visual. FTC-style enforcement and platform rules in late 2025/early 2026 favor clarity: verbal statements + on-screen text + caption.
5. Separate content license from compensation. Pay for promotions; pay extra for extended usage, exclusivity, or rights transfers.

What the Lego, e.l.f., and Skittles moves teach creators about contracts

Lego — AI, kids, and the danger of broad brand license asks

Adweek highlighted Lego’s “We Trust in Kids” campaign, which foregrounded AI and education. The messaging is culturally smart — and legally instructive. Brands talking about AI often want rights to use creator content for training, model testing, or derivative works.

Why that matters to you: a clause that reads like “all content created for Brand may be used by Brand for any purpose” can silently hand the brand rights to feed your videos, images, or voiceovers into proprietary AI models. That’s a long-term value transfer, and creators are rarely compensated appropriately for training data rights.

Negotiation tactics:

• Ask for an explicit AI carveout: prohibit use of your content as training data unless you receive separate compensation.
• Accept time-limited licenses (e.g., 2 years) rather than perpetual transfers when the brand’s use is promotional.
• Define permitted derivative uses (ads, social, OOH) and exclude “AI training” or “modeling” absent a separate agreement.

e.l.f. × Liquid Death — co-branded creative and shared ownership pitfalls

The goth musical between e.l.f. and Liquid Death shows how collaborations blur ownership. Co-branded or multi-brand campaigns often involve shared creative input, third-party talent, and cross-promotions — all of which complicate who owns what.

Key contract points:

• Joint ownership vs. licensed rights: Don’t assume shared campaigns mean shared ownership. Ask whether you’re granting an exclusive license to each brand or whether the brands will hold any ownership interest.
• Attribution and moral rights: If you want ongoing credit or approval rights over edit or use, put that in writing.
• Revenue-sharing for derivatives: If the campaign spawns merch, spin-offs, or NFTs, negotiate a split or predefined payment structure.

Skittles — PR stunts, publicity rights, and controlled chaos

Skittles’ decision to skip the Super Bowl in favor of a stunt with a known actor highlights another risk: publicity and personality rights. When a brand pairs with a celebrity or stages stunts that rely on a creator’s persona, contracts must address the boundaries of likeness, voice, and endorsement scope.

What to watch for:

• Names, likenesses, and impersonation permissions — who gets to use your image and for how long?
• Clear approval windows for edits that materially change your messaging or put you in controversial contexts.
• Non-disparagement clauses that are overly broad — negotiate scope and duration.

Practical disclosure rules for 2026: What “clear and conspicuous” looks like now

Regulators and platforms tightened expectations after several enforcement actions in 2025. While platforms each have their own mechanics, the core principle is unchanged: disclosures must be obvious to the average viewer.

Actionable disclosure checklist:

• Dual disclosure: Say it out loud in the video and show text on-screen within the first 3 seconds.
• Use platform-native tools: Use Instagram’s Paid Partnership tag, YouTube’s “Includes paid promotion” checkbox, and TikTok’s Branded Content toggle — and don’t rely on them alone.
• Captions & pinned comments: Repeat the disclosure in the caption and pin a comment with the same language for accessibility and searchability.
• Short-form best practice (TikTok/Reels): Use “Paid partnership with [Brand]” or “Ad: [Brand]” on-screen; if space is tight, pair a visible text overlay with a hashtag like #ad — but don’t *only* use hashtags with ambiguous wording like #partner.
• Livestreams & ephemeral content: State the sponsorship at the start and repeat every 15 minutes or before any call-to-action.

Sample disclosure language you can use now

• Short video (TikTok, Reels): on-screen text: “Ad — paid by [Brand]” + verbal: “This video is sponsored by [Brand].”
• Long-form (YouTube): verbal intro: “This episode is brought to you by [Brand]” + description: “Paid partnership with [Brand]; links below.”
• Livestream: verbal: “Thanks to [Brand] for sponsoring today — paid partnership” + on-screen badge if possible.

Core contract clauses every influencer should negotiate

Below are practical clause templates and negotiation notes. Save these as a starting point, then tailor for each deal.

1. Usage Rights (License) — sample language

"Creator grants Brand a non-exclusive, worldwide license to use the Content for promotional purposes on Brand’s owned and operated channels and paid social channels for a period of 24 months from first publish. Any use beyond 24 months or for training AI models, resale, or sublicensing requires a separate, written agreement and additional compensation."

Negotiation tips: ask for non-exclusive by default; if Brand demands exclusivity, require a higher fee and define a short time window and narrow categories.

2. Rights Buyout / Work-for-hire — warning language

If a brand insists on full assignment or work-for-hire, insist on:

• Substantial additional compensation (market standard is 2–5x the promotional rate).
• Explicit list of uses (ads, OOH, packaging) and territories.
• Representations that the brand will credit Creator when reasonably practical (if attribution matters).

3. Indemnity — balanced approach

"Brand shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Creator from any third-party claims arising from Brand-provided assets, claims that the Brand’s instructions or materials infringe any IP rights, or claims arising from Brand’s product representations. Creator shall indemnify Brand only for claims arising from Creator’s own breaches of this Agreement, including false statements or willful misconduct. Each party’s liability shall be capped at the total fees paid under this Agreement, except for claims of gross negligence, willful misconduct, or intellectual property infringement."

Why this matters: Brands often try to shift all risk to creators; this clause pushes back and ties indemnity exposure to the fee amount.

4. Approvals & Edits

"Creator will provide Brand with preview content for review. Brand may request up to two rounds of reasonable edits; any material changes to messaging or endorsement claims require Creator’s written approval. Brand may not alter Creator’s voice to promote claims inconsistent with Creator’s beliefs or content style."

Practical note: define timelines for approvals to avoid delays and unexpected last-minute rewrites.

5. Compensation Structure — split ownership of fees and performance

• Base fee for content creation and posting.
• Bonus for performance metrics (views, clicks, conversion events) with clear measurement windows and reporting.
• Separate fee for extended usage, exclusivity, or transfer of IP beyond the initial license.

Advanced strategies for 2026 and beyond

As brands experiment with AI, Web3 tie-ins, and rapid cross-channel repurposing, creators need forward-looking protections.

• AI protections: Insist on an explicit clause that disallows use of your content for model training, synthetic voice or deepfake creation, or require separate compensation and consent for any synthetic derivatives.
• Blockchain timestamps: Register key deliverables on a blockchain or with time-stamped registries to prove creation date and version history — useful in rights disputes.
• Use content ID services: Enroll music and video in platform content ID systems or third-party monitoring to detect unauthorized reuse.
• Contract automation: Use template-based negotiation tools (or counsel) that allow you to swap in preferred license language quickly when brands send take-it-or-leave-it agreements.

Practical signing checklist — 11 things to confirm before you click "accept"

1. Scope of work: Are deliverables, formats, and publishing windows explicit?
2. License scope: Duration, territory, exclusivity, sublicenses?
3. AI use: Is training expressly allowed or prohibited?
4. Compensation: Base fee, bonuses, payment schedule, and penalties for late payment?
5. Indemnity & liability cap: Who pays for third-party claims and how much?
6. Approval rights: Rounds of edits and timelines.
7. Disclosure obligations: Who writes the disclosure language and where does it appear?
8. Moral rights & attribution: Is credit guaranteed or optional?
9. Warranties: Are you asked to guarantee accuracy or outcomes?
10. Termination & kill fees: Can either party end the deal, and is the Creator paid if the campaign is cancelled late?
11. Data & analytics access: Will Brand share performance data tied to bonuses?

Case studies: Contract clauses mapped to this week’s campaigns

Below are short hypotheticals linking clauses above to the campaigns Adweek called out this week.

Lego hypothetical

Scenario: Lego asks you to create educational videos about AI for kids and requests perpetual, worldwide rights including “use for research and training.”

What to negotiate: limit rights to 24 months, exclude AI model training, and require parental-consent compliance language if the content targets minors. Request a higher fee for any extended educational licensing or curriculum integration.

e.l.f. × Liquid Death hypothetical

Scenario: Two brands want to co-produce a mini-musical with shared credits, merch potential, and music licensing.

What to negotiate: clarify whether the soundtrack is a work-for-hire and who controls sync and mechanical rights; set pre-agreed revenue shares for merch and derivative uses; protect your name and image from being used in unrelated future campaigns.

Skittles hypothetical

Scenario: Brand wants to associate your likeness with a high-profile stunt and wants the right to use your clips in future PR.

What to negotiate: set narrow usage windows for PR, require approval for any editing that changes the context, and get a kill fee if the stunt causes reputational backlash.

Why these steps matter now: trends from late 2025–early 2026

In late 2025 and into 2026 we’ve seen three converging trends: increased regulator focus on undisclosed endorsements, brands pressing for broad AI/derivative rights, and a spike in co-branded stunts that create complex ownership webs. The result: creators face greater enforcement risk and more value transfers if they accept standard brand contracts unchanged.

Staying proactive — asking for specific carveouts, tying buyouts to clear fees, and using layered disclosures — is now table stakes.

Final checklist: 7 immediate actions to protect yourself

1. Never sign perpetual rights for a single promotional fee.
2. Always get disclosure language in writing and test it on each platform.
3. Insist on an explicit AI carveout or separate compensation for training/modeling rights.
4. Push back on one-way indemnities; seek a balanced clause with a liability cap tied to fees.
5. Demand performance reporting if you’re owed bonuses.
6. Keep a redline template for common clauses so you can negotiate fast.
7. When in doubt, get a contract attorney to review buyouts or complex co-brand deals — the cost is often less than the value surrendered.

Call to action

If you want a plug-and-play starting point, download our influencer contract checklist and the three template clauses shown above (licensing, indemnity, and disclosure) tailored for 2026 risks. Want a quick review? Submit one brand contract and get a 30-minute risk summary from our legal partners — built for creators, priced for creators.

Protect your creative ownership before you post — because one clause can cost you far more than one campaign is worth.

Related Reading

• Host an India-Themed World Cup Watch Party: Menu, Drinks and Timing for 99 Million Viewers
• Field Review — Microcation Meal Kits & Backyard Micro‑Adventures (2026): What to Pack, Cook, and Share
• Red Light vs. RGBIC Mood Lamps: What Kind of Home Light Should You Use to Support Collagen and Skin Health?
• Sovereign Cloud vs Availability: Trade-offs When Choosing AWS European Sovereign Cloud
• Ethics and Opportunity: How to Cover Sports Betting Responsibly While Monetizing Content